<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>revjim.net - Latest Comments in LifeHacker and the separation of content</title><link>http://revjim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://revjim.disqus.com/lifehacker_and_the_separation_of_content/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 08:19:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: LifeHacker and the separation of content</title><link>http://revjim.net/2006/05/03/lifehacker-and-the-separation-of-content/#comment-4224102</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm guessing you already check out &lt;a href="http://boingboing.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="boingboing.net"&gt;boingboing.net&lt;/a&gt;, but just in case, one of the posts from it today was for FeedRinse:  &lt;a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/16/feedrinse_filters_fo.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.boingboing.net/2006/05/16/feedrinse_filters_fo.html"&gt;http://www.boingboing.net/2...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It allows you to filter RSS feeds so you only see  what you want to see.  I imagine if you're reading LifeHacker via RSS, you could use FeedRinse to clean up that feed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 08:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>