<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>revjim.net - Latest Comments in JS-Kit: a hosted commenting system</title><link>http://revjim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:24:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: JS-Kit: a hosted commenting system</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/19/js-kit-a-hosted-commenting-system/#comment-162818</link><description>Thanks for the pointer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd seen SezWho in my initial search for a centralized comments service. &lt;br&gt;While I agree with you that hosting comments externally does forfeit &lt;br&gt;some features locally, it is my goal to find similar, if not better, &lt;br&gt;features in the hosted service I use. I'm not just looking to have the &lt;br&gt;comments connected, grouped, rated, or shown with reputation. I want to &lt;br&gt;eliminate user logins and provide commenters with a consistent interface &lt;br&gt;that they'll understand and be familiar with. Additionally, SezWho &lt;br&gt;requires that I have a working comments system already. While that is &lt;br&gt;the case on this blog, that is NOT the case in all of the places I &lt;br&gt;intend to use centralized comments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for your time. I'm sure SezWho is a good fit for someone. Just &lt;br&gt;not me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">revjim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:24:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JS-Kit: a hosted commenting system</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/19/js-kit-a-hosted-commenting-system/#comment-161834</link><description>Revjim, take a look at SezWho as well...We provide the value in terms of connecting the conversations across sites without really taking over the whole comment system ... So you don't lose critical functionality like Trackbacks and other widgets like top commenters, recent comments etc. Also with the content on your site, you keep the page rank juice and page views on your sites as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jitendra</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:53:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JS-Kit: a hosted commenting system</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/19/js-kit-a-hosted-commenting-system/#comment-161604</link><description>I look forward to your upcoming OpenID Profile. If you include an XML&lt;br&gt;based comment importer as well well with well defined format, I may&lt;br&gt;even switch over when the time comes. I was quite impressed with your&lt;br&gt;service offering for content authors. I just wanted a little more in&lt;br&gt;terms of what my READERS will get from it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">revjim</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:25:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: JS-Kit: a hosted commenting system</title><link>http://revjim.net/2008/02/19/js-kit-a-hosted-commenting-system/#comment-161598</link><description>Thanks for post, Revjim, especially for your constructive criticisms.  We take these to heart.  Just a  quick followup:   JS-Kit has absolutely NOT abandoned the goal of building "community or social" services.  We have chosen to focus initially on building scale and on expanding our suite of content-generating services in the belief that "social" features are most valuable when they are broadly inclusive.    You rightly point out that our dashboard is not designed to help users manage their comments across sites.  That will be handled by our forthcoming, OpenID-based) user profile.  Stay tuned, and thanks again for the review.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers, &lt;br&gt;Eric&lt;br&gt;JS-Kit</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eblantz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:22:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>