<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>revjim.net - Latest Comments in ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:50:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-7581284</link><description>As with all systems there is a learning curve. But with all the features available (Content Objects, nodes, XML content area, etc.) I would definitely give it some time. Especialy if you're building Corporate sites. Oh and performance is definitely not an issue if you can set up APC, etc. few basic tweaks on the server.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marko</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 04:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-4223849</link><description>Wow. That&amp;#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article&lt;br&gt;is 4 years old. It&amp;#039;s hard to believe the software is still being&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;developed and this stuff hasn&amp;#039;t been fixed. &lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-4223847</link><description>Wow. That&amp;#039;s actually shocking that they are still true. This article is 4 years old. It&amp;#039;s hard to believe the software is still being developed and this stuff hasn&amp;#039;t been fixed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-4223848</link><description>Well, most of the points in this article are still true and valid.  I guess I found your blog post, because I could not believe that eZ Publish actually performs so bad, looking for potential oversights on the net.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel F. Kudwien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-1830517</link><description>This post is quite old. I'm not sure what the state of EZPublish is these days.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">revjim</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:29:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ezPublish: slow and crufty</title><link>http://revjim.net/2004/02/07/ezpublish-slow-and-crufty/#comment-1830487</link><description>You should definitely have a look at Drupal.  I needed to review eZ publish for a client and was appalled at how bad eZ publish performs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tha_sun</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>