<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>revjim.net - Latest Comments in Could Typo Be the Problem?</title><link>http://revjim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:53:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Could Typo Be the Problem?</title><link>http://revjim.net/2006/02/03/could-typo-be-the-problem/#comment-4223754</link><description>If it's not too much trouble now you've switched back to wordpress, could you drop me some mail with more details of the issues you had with Typo. I really want to know what things piss users off, because they're obviously the things that need fixing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks in advance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Piers Cawley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:53:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Could Typo Be the Problem?</title><link>http://revjim.net/2006/02/03/could-typo-be-the-problem/#comment-4223753</link><description>Besides being PHP, Wordpress is a real code spaghetti (no OO, no design pattern...). BTW Typo model is very bad, e.g. the main table (content) is consisted of comments and articles together while many foreign keys are binded to articles. seems foolish!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Reza</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>